From its inception, American Abstract Expressionism art has been both denounced for being a “social hazard” and praised for exemplifying and advocating the very ideals our nation was founded upon (Mathews 161). Unlike the artwork of Norman Rockwell which promoted and idealized wholesome American values or the clearly representational artwork of Andrew Wyeth; American Abstract Expressionist art deviated from formal artistic conventions and American traditions and therefore was branded as being Communistic in nature (Mathews 156). This artwork was also condemned for its lack of concrete subject matter and for portraying a contorted view of reality (Mathews 166). Because of their unrestrained departure from traditional American values and ideals and the unwavering resistance these artists had to conforming to the set standard, many political figures like George Dondero and Richard Nixon adamantly denounced this art movement and its artists and viewed it as a direct threat to all that was American (Mathews 156).
Ironically, it was American Abstract Expressionist art that ultimately designated
"Today painters do not have to go to a subject matter outside of themselves. Most modern painters work from a different source. They work from within."
- Jackson Pollock
Jackson Pollock’s famous painting, Autumn Rhythm, is a direct manifestation of what American Abstract Expressionism represented. This painting could be denounced by many for being dangerous and a threat to all social and cultural order and harmony for several reasons. Firstly, it lacks a concrete subject matter and portrays a distorted, chaotic, nonrepresentational depiction of reality; thus failing to provide its audience with any readily identifiable or associable images or depictions (Mathews 168). It does not dictate what the viewer should or should not see, but instead places the responsibility on the viewer and challenges them to interpret the painting through their own eyes. Secondly, since this artwork relies so heavily upon the personal subjective views of the artist; it could be easily misinterpreted or misunderstood. The initial inability to readily comprehend and fully grasp the meaning of this painting could cause individuals to feel intimidated and frustrated and ultimately brand this type of art work as “degenerate” and even elitist (Mathews 171). Finally, this painting does not concretely propagate or glorify American ideals and values, and therefore could be viewed as a Communist conspiracy to eradicate all that is American, and in essence a direct threat to American Democracy (Mathews 162).
While researching the life and artwork of Jackson Pollock; I stumbled upon the website, www.JacksonPollock.org. This website allows any individuals the opportunity to create Pollock-esque artwork. As I sat at my computer desk creating my own “masterpiece”, a sense of complete liberation washed over me. Creating this type of artwork was in essence pure individualism, a hundred percent unblemished self-expression.
"Every shape becomes an organic entity, inviting the multiplicity of associations inherent in all living things"- Mark Rothko
On the other hand, this painting celebrates Rothko’s subjective perception of reality and is therefore an ideal representation of pure, untainted artistic self-expression. The dynamic interactions of the solid bands of color engulf the canvas and create a cohesive harmony that subliminally speaks to the viewer. The irregular boundaries of the rectangles express a wild, primitive like quality and the lack of any recognizable subject matter only helps to add to the dimension of the painting. This painting connects the viewer with their inner psyche; promoting deep self reflection and introspection. The viewer is ultimately allowed to extract whatever underlying meaning they wish to subconsciously discover. This is a work of art that glories the inner self and applauds the expression of individual creativity.
"Without ethical consciousness, a painter is only a decorator."
—Robert Motherwell
Robert Motherwell’s painting, Elegy to the Spanish Republic No. 110, is a model example of how American Abstract Expressionist art is an individualistic experience for both the artist and the viewer. Critics could openly denounce this work for the social commentary it makes against war and the horrendous pain and suffering that it brings to all humanity; a main reason many politicians wanted to censor abstract art during the Cold War years (Mathews 156). Though it lacks any discernible subject matter, the use of bulbous, irregular ovals sandwiched tightly between rectangular columns conveys an atmosphere of intense conflict and hostility. The unique spatial arrangement of the ovals also aids in conveying a rebelliously expressive tone to the viewer. I believe the contrasting utilization of black and white paint in this painting may to serve to be a metaphor for the undying struggle between good and. evil, right and. wrong, and the individual against the world. This painting hypnotically entices the viewer and dares them to search the depth of their souls; subconsciously asking the questions that will ultimately lead them to the painting’s innate essence. Eventually, after much introspection and contemplation, the viewer should be able to fuse the abstract images with the deeply embedded concrete meaning of this painting. This painting is not only creative and unique in its design and execution, but is also the visual personification of authentic artistic self-expression and unrestrained freedom; in essence the very type of art that Hitler, Stalin, Dondero, and many other prominent political figures passionately detested and feared (Cockcroft 152).
“An artist is forced by others to paint out of his own free will.”
-Willem de Kooning
"The nature of anguish is translated into different forms."
-Franz Kline
No comments:
Post a Comment